skip navigation
student.bmj.com

Respond to this article

Identifying problem medical students early

Richard Hays looks at the evidence

Basic medical education is needed to produce graduates who can enter postgraduate training and be part of future healthcare delivery, for perhaps 40 years. Expected graduate outcomes in the United Kingdom are described in Tomorrow’s Doctors.1 Predicting what the future holds is difficult, and the outcomes naturally tend to focus on educational principles and current roles for doctors. A new version of Tomorrow’s Doctors will be released in 2009 following a routine periodic review,2 with a more contemporary, broadly based, and detailed description of the outcomes, embracing the current concept of “fit for purpose,” or readiness to work as junior doctors in the NHS.

A central feature of being a doctor is the professional role, arguably best captured within the CANMEDS (Canadian Medical Education Directions for Specialists) documentation and Good Medical Practice.3 4 Doctors in all specialties have a privileged place of trust in the lives of patients. We must put patient care first, sort out potentially complex problems, communicate options, perform sophisticated management in teams, manage health care (budgets and people), understand our limits, and take steps to care for ourselves.

Outside of work we have personal and family lives. Getting the balance right can be difficult, both in and across personal and professional roles. As a profession we often manage this poorly, and have high rates of drug misuse and mental health problems.5 6 Medical students also have quite high rates of stress and mental health problems,7 although prefer not to report this.8 Worryingly, there is some evidence that professional problems during student times are associated with a higher risk of professional problems in later practice.9

What can medical schools do about this? Is this nature or nurture? Can we select for and support “good professionalism”? Most medical schools commit substantial resources to selection processes. They can select from many academically strong, motivated applicants and in theory should be able to minimise the numbers of students who enter with the potential to become a “problem student.” They also have several years of teaching, assessing, role modelling, and student support to help students to achieve self awareness and to identify and guide problem students. There is General Medical Council guidance for the development of professionalism and dealing with student fitness to practise concerns (also under review to improve their practical applicability). These are particularly important for managing the relatively few students with serious problems who cannot be remediated.10

How common are students with problems? There is a paucity of good data on this, but the anecdotal answer is quite common. Many cases present as poor academic performance in students accustomed to doing well. However, relatively few students have genuine academic performance problems and this presentation is often a proxy for other problems: adjustment to higher education and independence; family pressures; realisation that medicine is not the right career; and poor mental or physical health. Most medical schools have a range of student support services, both academic guidance and pastoral care. Many students do well with learning skills development, time out to deal with issues at home and simply gaining maturity. Students who do least well are those with motivation and mental health or personality problems. Loss of motivation can be hard to deal with because telling parents about changes to career plans is difficult if family and teachers promoted an indecisive vocational choice. Students with mental health problems are not common, but can be hard to detect and difficult to manage. The most worrying features may be dishonesty, violent behaviour, and lack of insight and ability to change.11

One strategy that should improve the management of problem students is a change of culture in medical schools. Most problems can be solved without impeding progress. Early intervention is crucial, so students should present or be referred early to support services to gain more benefit. It is important for the schools to work out early what kind of problem is present and to refer students for appropriate support. Ideally, the student support service is separate from academic management and student societies (although these can nevertheless be part of support) because this provides better confidentiality. It is also essential that students listen to advice that might be difficult to absorb because this should help them to make difficult decisions. A small number of students are really better off either taking a year out to think about things, with the option of returning, or leaving the course gracefully and finding another course that leads to a rewarding career. The earlier this is done, the easier life is in the long run.

Although medicine is a wonderful career for most students, it can also be challenging and difficult. It is not for everyone and certainly is not for people who lack insight and the ability to seek advice and develop coping skills. Both medical schools and students have their parts to play in ensuring that the future of the profession is in good hands.

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

See the commentary that accompanied “Medical students’ compliance with simple administrative tasks and success in final examinations: retrospective cohort study” (Student BMJ 2002;10:328, http://student.bmj.com/issues/02/09/papers/328.php).

Richard Hays chair of medical education and head of school School of Medicine, Keele University
r.b.hays@hfac.keele.ac.uk
Student BMJ 2009;17:001-036-ISSN 0966-6494 | January 2009
  1. General Medical Council. Tomorrows Doctors, 2003. Online at http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/undergraduate_policy/tomorrows_doctors.asp (accessed November 2008)
  2. General medical Council. Review of Tomorrow’s Doctors. Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/news_and_projects/review_of_undergraduate_education.asp (accessed November 2008)
  3. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework. Available at: http://meds.queensu.ca/medicine/obgyn/pdf/CanMEDS2005.booklet.pdf (accessed November 2008)
  4. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. 2006 Edition. Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/index.asp (accessed November 2007).
  5. Tyssen R, Vaglum P. Mental Health problems among young doctors: an updated review of prospective studies. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 2002; 10: 154-165.
  6. Bennet J, O’Donovan D. Substance abuse by doctors, nurses and other health care workers. Current opinion in Psychiatry, 2001; 14: 195-199.
  7. Midtgaard M, Ekeburg O, Vaglum P, Tyssen R. Mental health treatment needs for medical students: a national longitudinal study. European Psychiatry 2008; 23: 505-511.
  8. Chew-Graham CA, Rogers A, Yassin N. ‘I wouldn’t want it on my cv or their records’ – medical students’ experiences of help-seeking for mental health problems. Medical Education 2003; 37: 873-880.
  9. Papadakis MA, Hodgson CS, Tehrani A, Kohatsu ND (2004). Unprofessional behaviour in medical schools associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a State Medical Board. Academic Medicine, 74, 980-99.
  10. General Medical Council, 2007. Medical Students: Professional Behaviour and Fitness To Practise. At: http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/undergraduate_policy/professional_behaviour.asp
  11. Hays RB, Jolly BJ, Caldon LJM et al (2002). Is insight important? Measuring the capacity to change. Medical Education, 3, 965-71.
Return to top    Next article

 Printable version      Download PDF    E-mail this to a friend    Respond to this article    Request Permissions

EDITORIALS
Identifying problem medical students early
      (Richard Hays, January 2009)

Simon Lammy
(January 12th, 2009)
 Final Year Medical Student,  UCL Medical School s.lammy@ucl.ac.uk

TOP


The issues raised in this short piece have abounded in many forums for discussion for some time. Students through medical school are bound to encounter some problems courtesy of being human beings. However, some respond to these normal challenges in markedly different ways. Many studies have been conducted concerning student responses to problems when put in context to their economic and social circumstances.

The obvious fact that economic and social factors can serve as a useful marker for academic success, which can strongly impact upon a students motivation for medicine that undergoes severe testing more than once throughout medical school, does have one important significance.

Medical schools are doing more to widen the profession to candidates from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (i.e. unconventional backgrounds - whatever that means). The changes concerning tuition fees and other economic factors could impact strongly upon these very same students academic performance - and thus cause more to present for counselling support.

Medicine is changing from the top down and bottom up. The stigma that failure at one stage could results in career damage and that seeking help could weaken ones perception amongst an extremely competitive peer group needs addressing. One way could be for those successful doctors who have failed miserably at one stage, whether it be academic and non-academic in nature, to act to blast the stigmatisation to pieces.




EDITORIALS
Identifying problem medical students early
      (Richard Hays, January 2009)

Azizul Nur Abdul Aziz Al-Akbar and Rohit PT Narayan
(January 19th, 2009)
 Fourth Year Medical Students,  School of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT ana430@bham.ac.uk

TOP


Richard Hays highlights the importance of identifying "problem students" early and proposes sensible means by which such students can be subsequently helped.[1] However, we don't think he goes far enough in offering novel practical solutions as to exactly how such students can be identified.

It's postulated that selecting academically strong individuals on the basis of a 15-minute interview, and subsequent student contact during formal teaching and assessments, may perhaps be enough to root out the "problem students". But what about those who develop mental health problems after joining medical school or post-exams, or cleverly disguise their dishonest behaviour from the authorities (medical school/hospital staff)?

We feel medical students tend to be more open with fellow students, due to experiencing similar academic hardships and are thus better equipped to fully empathise, than authority figures. Involving medical students therefore, is likely to be an effective strategy to help identify "problem students" early. It is imperative that there is clear guidance and support not only for those undergoing difficult circumstances, but also those reporting fellow students; whether it is for help or whistle-blowing.

    References:
  1. Hays R. Identifying problem medical students early. Student BMJ 2009;17:001-036